Opinion: Fixing the disconnect between archaeologists and Indigenous folks

Article content material

A current article entitled “Individuals arrived in Fort McMurray Wooden Buffalo space not less than 11,000 years in the past” solutions the large query that archaeologists have been asking for a few years—when did folks come to the world? The one downside with this query (as Woywitka et al. are distinctive archaeologists) is that they’re answering a query that Indigenous folks within the space have already got a solution for.

Article content material

The information that Indigenous peoples had been residing within the Fort McMurray space maybe so long as 13,000 years in the past was one thing that they had probably discovered after they had been younger by way of tales instructed to them by their grandparents.

Article content material

Immediately these tales proceed to be encoded into their land and language with panorama options attributed to the actions of Pleistocene megafauna who died out round 11,000 years in the past.   

So why are archeologists right this moment doing analysis on questions that have already got solutions? That is largely attributable to archaeology’s colonial roots.

For instance, early British archaeologists in Egypt and elsewhere tended to easily use locals as guide labour earlier than bringing the spoils of their expeditions again to Britain. In North America, archaeology was outright racist throughout its infancy usually attributing main archeological websites to ‘others’ quite than the present Indigenous inhabitants that Canadian and American governments had been busy making an attempt to colonize.

Article content material

Fortunately a lot has modified in archaeology as a result of introduction of Indigenous archaeology, the place archaeology is motivated by the targets and aspirations of Indigenous peoples usually with them on the helm.  

So why has this disconnect between archaeologists and Indigenous folks persevered within the Treaty 8 area of Alberta—particularity within the Fort McMurray space the place forestry and oilsands improvement has required in depth archaeological investigations over the past a number of many years?

The latest response from Albertan regulators is that to incorporate Indigenous peoples within the regulatory course of related to historic (archaeological) sources would run counter to the present authorities’s Purple Tape Discount Coverage. This lies in distinction to the comparable treaty context of Treaty 8 B.C., the place Indigenous peoples are consulted on archaeological permits.  

Article content material

Regardless of the grim regulatory scene in Alberta, some educational archaeologists—not certain by provincial laws and proponents’ budgets—are making developments in constructing relationships with Treaty 8 First Nations in Alberta. A lot of this progress is acts of service beneath the tragic context of the seek for unmarked graves related to Indian Residential Faculties.  

How can we get Indigenous archaeology to begin occurring within the Fort McMurray space within the context of assessments linked to forestry and oilsands improvement?

One strategy is for Indigenous communities to companion with consulting archaeologists in significant methods. Significant doesn’t imply an organization makes use of the group’s title to get contracts in alternate for 5 per cent of the revenue.

Moderately these relationships ought to embody technical coaching alternatives for youth; creating moral areas for Indigenous Data to be shared and guarded; and a transfer away from giving higher privilege to ‘skilled’ publications and conferences in the direction of the creation of group merchandise and displays.

Solely then can archaeologists catch as much as the Indigenous understanding of the previous and begin collaboratively asking questions sooner or later.  

Ave Dersch, Ph.D. is an archaeologist who works with a number of First Nations within the Fort McMurray area.

Article content material