April 15, 2024

Councillor Ken Ball argued that the RMWB should determine rapidly with what to do with the newly acquired Draper properties earlier than they fall into disrepair.

Article content material

Council needs to determine what to do with the 9 properties in Draper that are actually owned by the municipality. The properties had been a part of buyouts for residents in flood-prone sections of Draper final yr and there are considerations the properties and properties will deteriorate.

Commercial 2

Article content material

The movement, proposed by Councillor Ken Ball at Tuesday’s council assembly, orders administration to evaluation and current choices for what might be completed with the properties. Delaying motion will assure “grief” for the municipality, he mentioned.

Article content material

“What I’d prefer to see is that administration comes again to us with a report that frankly suggests the best choice for every of the properties,” mentioned Ball. “One could be promoting it and somebody residing in it. One could be somebody shopping for the house and relocating it to a property some other place. One could be this place is totally in disarray and must be demolished. However we haven’t mentioned something.”

Council accredited buyouts in Draper in July 2023. CAO Henry Hunter mentioned the final of the 9 properties was bought by the RMWB in December. Inspections are completed each 48 hours and the within are inspected for injury each two months. The properties have additionally been winterized.

Commercial 3

Article content material

Council was informed there aren’t any authorized restrictions stopping the municipality from promoting the newly acquired properties. The buyout course of was totally different than a typical expropriation course of, which obligates the municipality to make these lands out there to a third-party if not used inside two years.

Representatives from the RMWB additionally informed council that administration was already making a report for council that would come with choices. This contains prices of demolishing, salvaging and shifting the properties.

“We had been demolishing them, salvaging and demolishing, and that was the choices. That’s simple. It’s fairly clear, it’s fairly outlined,” mentioned Hunter. “In the mean time it’s fairly large open and if we are able to slim it down a little bit bit, that will make it even simpler for us to have the ability to do one thing.”

Commercial 4

Article content material

Councillor Jane Stroud mentioned she has heard considerations from residents that individuals who accepted buyouts would purchase ack their properties at a reduced worth. She identified the buyout was meant to take away individuals from residing in a flood-prone space. Councillor Stu Wigle, who represents Draper on council, agreed with considerations talked about by Stroud.

“The people who didn’t take the buyout didn’t have the choice to then promote their property after which have a possibility to rebuy it again,” he mentioned. “I don’t suppose it’s truthful for the taxpayers cash to additionally promote out after which give them the choice to promote it again.”

Ball mentioned he felt all choices must be proposed to council so the problem might be resolved rapidly. Wigle mentioned he’s open to shifting properties off the properties, however opposes promoting the properties as-is.

Councillor Keith McGrath was the one councillor to oppose the movement. Councillor Kendrick Cardinal was absent from the assembly.

Get the information and occasions of Fort McMurray Wooden Buffalo in your inbox each Friday morning by signing up for our publication.

[email protected]

Article content material